While you're thinking of ICEMT 2023, we want to facilitate you with the smooth processes along with professional accurate information. Welcome researchers, academicians, industry experts or enthusiastic individuals in the related filed to submit paper.
The manuscript in one
column format, between 8-10 pages, extra pages (from
Page 11) will be charged at 70 USD/per page.
Manuscripts must be written in English and follow
the instructions at
Manuscript Formatting and Templates.
Accepted and presented papers will be published into conference proceedings, will be included in the major data base, EI Compendex, Scopus, etc,the proceedings will be distributed during the Conference.
Accepted articles will be invited for as oral /poster/video/online presentation, depending on the nature and quality of the paper.
We encourage you to send informative abstract (200-400 words) which is a compendious summary of a paper's substance including its background, purpose, methodology, results, and conclusion.
Submissions to ICEMT
2023 must not substantially overlap with papers that
are published or simultaneously submitted to other
venues (including journals or
Double-submission will result in immediate rejection.
Detected violations may be reported to other conference chairs and journal editors.
Peer Review Process
By submitting a paper to ICEMT 2023, the authors agree to the review process and understand that papers undergo a peer-review process. Manuscripts will be reviewed by appropriately qualified experts in the related field selected by the Conference Committees, who will give detailed comments and — if the submission gets accepted — the authors submit a revised ("camera-ready") version that takes into account this feedback. All papers are reviewed using a double-blind review process: authors declare their names and affiliations in the manuscript for the reviewers to see, but reviewers do not know each other's identities, nor do the authors receive information about who has reviewed their manuscript. The Committees of ICEMT 2023 will invest great efforts in reviewing the papers submitted to the conference and organising the sessions to enable the participants to gain maximum benefit.
Review Process Flowchart
By submitting a manuscript to ICEMT 2023, authors
acknowledge that it has not been previously
published or accepted for publication in
substantially similar form in any peer-reviewed
venue with publicly accessible papers, including
journals, conferences, workshops, or other
peer-reviewed, archival forums. Furthermore, no
paper substantially similar in content has been or
will be submitted to another peer-reviewed
conference or workshop with publicly accessible
papers during the review period. The authors also
attest that they do not submit a substantially
similar submission to ICEMT 2023. As a rule of
thumb, the ICEMT 2023 submission should contain no
more than 20 percent of material from previous
publications. Violation of any of these conditions
will lead to rejection.
Technical Facilities for Oral Presentation
*Please be aware that internet access is not guaranteed. So having an external storage source is imperative. If you need some extra software for your presentation, please contact the conference secretary in advance to make sure it is possible.
Amid the present COVID-19 pandemic’s situation, besides the regular onsite presentation format (oral), ICEMT 2023 will also provide online presentation for presenters who cannot attend the physical conference due to the epidemic.
1. For the online presentation, presenters also need to prepare a PowerPoint or PDF file in advance.
2. The online presentation will be around 15 minutes including 2-3 minutes for Q&A.
3. There will be arranged separate sessions for online presentation. More details about guideline, it will be released around 1 months before the conference.
4. Online presentation will have the discounted registration fee. More details please click: http://www.icemt.org/registration.html
ICEMT is utterly intolerant of plagiarism. Submitted
papers are expected to contain original work
executed by the authors with adequate, proper and
scholarly citations to the work of others. It is the
job of the authors to clearly identify both their
own contribution(s) and also published results /
techniques on which they depend or build. Reviewers
are charged to ensure these standards are met.
If the author is found to commit an act of plagiarism, the following acts of sanction will be taken:
1. Reject the article submitted or delete the article from the final publications.
2. Report the authors violation to his/her supervisor(s) and affiliated institution(s).
3. Report the authors violation to the appropriate overseeing office of academic ethics and research funding agency.
4. Reserve the right to publish the authors name(s), the title of the article, the name(s) of the affiliated institution and the details of misconduct, etc. of the plagiarist”.
Copyright © International Conference on Education and Multimedia Technology All rights reserved.