While you're thinking of ICEMT 2025, we want to facilitate you with the smooth processes along with professional accurate information. Welcome researchers, academicians, industry experts or enthusiastic individuals in the related filed to submit paper.

Full Paper

The manuscript in one column format, between 8-10 pages, extra pages (from Page 11) will be charged at 70 USD/per page. Manuscripts must be written in English and follow the instructions at Manuscript Formatting and Templates.

Accepted and presented papers will be published into conference proceedings, will be included in the major data base, EI Compendex and Scopus the proceedings will be distributed during the conference.

Accepted articles will be invited for as oral presentation, depending on the nature and quality of the paper.

Abstract (Presentation only)

We encourage you to send informative abstract (200-400 words) which is a compendious summary of a paper's substance including its background, purpose, methodology, results, and conclusion.

Submission Online

Click to Submit Now!

Submissions to ICEMT 2025 must not substantially overlap with papers that are published or simultaneously submitted to other venues (including journals or conferences/workshops).

Double-submission will result in immediate rejection.

Detected violations may be reported to other conference chairs and journal editors.

Peer Review Process

By submitting a paper to ICEMT 2025, the authors agree to the review process and understand that papers undergo a peer-review process. Manuscripts will be reviewed by appropriately qualified experts in the related field selected by the Conference Committees, who will give detailed comments and — if the submission gets accepted — the authors submit a revised ("camera-ready") version that takes into account this feedback. All papers are reviewed using a double-blind review process: authors declare their names and affiliations in the manuscript for the reviewers to see, but reviewers do not know each other's identities, nor do the authors receive information about who has reviewed their manuscript. The Committees of ICEMT 2025 will invest great efforts in reviewing the papers submitted to the conference and organising the sessions to enable the participants to gain maximum benefit.

Review Process Flowchart

Dual/Double Submissions:

By submitting a manuscript to ICEMT 2025, authors acknowledge that it has not been previously published or accepted for publication in substantially similar form in any peer-reviewed venue with publicly accessible papers, including journals, conferences, workshops, or other peer-reviewed, archival forums. Furthermore, no paper substantially similar in content has been or will be submitted to another peer-reviewed conference or workshop with publicly accessible papers during the review period. The authors also attest that they do not submit a substantially similar submission to ICEMT 2025. As a rule of thumb, the ICEMT 2025 submission should contain no more than 20 percent of material from previous publications. Violation of any of these conditions will lead to rejection.

Technical Facilities for Oral Presentation
-Laptop
-Projector
-Pointer

Please be aware that internet access is not guaranteed. So having an external storage source is imperative. If you need some extra software for your presentation, please contact the conference secretary in advance to make sure it is possible.

Plagiarism

ICEMT is utterly intolerant of plagiarism. Submitted papers are expected to contain original work executed by the authors with adequate, proper and scholarly citations to the work of others. It is the job of the authors to clearly identify both their own contribution(s) and also published results/techniques on which they depend or build. Reviewers are charged to ensure these standards are met.

If the author is found to commit an act of plagiarism, the following acts of sanction will be taken:

1. Reject the article submitted or delete the article from the final publications.

2. Report the authors violation to his/her supervisor(s) and affiliated institution(s).

3. Report the authors violation to the appropriate overseeing office of academic ethics and research funding agency.

4. Reserve the right to publish the authors name(s), the title of the article, the name(s) of the affiliated institution and the details of misconduct, etc. of the plagiarist.